Application of chemoresistive gas sensors and chemometric analysis to differentiate the fingerprints of global volatile organic compounds from diseases. Preliminary results of COPD, lung cancer and breast cancer
Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
Background: Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a screening method that discriminates between disease and healthy subjects, few studies evaluate whether these chemical fingerprints are specific when compared between diseases. We evaluated global VOCs and their discrimination capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, breast cancer and healthy subjects by chemoresistive sensors and chemometric analysis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 30 patients with lung cancer, 50 with breast cancer, 50 with COPD and 50 control subjects. Each participant%27s exhaled breath was analyzed with the electronic nose. A multivariate analysis was carried: principal component analysis (PCA) and, canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP). Twenty single-blind samples from the 4 study groups were evaluated by CAP. Results: A separation between the groups of patients to the controls was achieved through PCA with explanations of >90%25 of the data and with a correct classification of 100%25. In the CAP of the 4 study groups, discrimination between the diseases was obtained with 2 canonical axes with a correct general classification of 91.35%25. This model was used for the prediction of the single-blind samples resulting in correct classification of 100%25. Conclusions: The application of chemoresistive gas sensors and chemometric analysis can be used as a useful tool for a screening test for lung cancer, breast cancer and COPD since this equipment detects the set of VOCs present in the exhaled breath to generate a characteristic chemical fingerprint of each disease. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
Background: Analysis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in exhaled breath has been proposed as a screening method that discriminates between disease and healthy subjects, few studies evaluate whether these chemical fingerprints are specific when compared between diseases. We evaluated global VOCs and their discrimination capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), lung cancer, breast cancer and healthy subjects by chemoresistive sensors and chemometric analysis. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted with the participation of 30 patients with lung cancer, 50 with breast cancer, 50 with COPD and 50 control subjects. Each participant's exhaled breath was analyzed with the electronic nose. A multivariate analysis was carried: principal component analysis (PCA) and, canonical analysis of principal coordinates (CAP). Twenty single-blind samples from the 4 study groups were evaluated by CAP. Results: A separation between the groups of patients to the controls was achieved through PCA with explanations of >90%25 of the data and with a correct classification of 100%25. In the CAP of the 4 study groups, discrimination between the diseases was obtained with 2 canonical axes with a correct general classification of 91.35%25. This model was used for the prediction of the single-blind samples resulting in correct classification of 100%25. Conclusions: The application of chemoresistive gas sensors and chemometric analysis can be used as a useful tool for a screening test for lung cancer, breast cancer and COPD since this equipment detects the set of VOCs present in the exhaled breath to generate a characteristic chemical fingerprint of each disease. © 2021 Elsevier B.V.
publication date
funding provided via
published in
Research
keywords
Breast cancer; Chemoresistive sensors; COPD; Electronic nose; Exhaled breath; Lung cancer; Screening test volatile organic compound; adult; antifungal activity; Article; breast cancer; bronchoscopy; canonical analysis; chemical fingerprinting; chemometric analysis; chronic cough; chronic obstructive lung disease; controlled study; cross-sectional study; discriminant analysis; dyspnea; electric resistance; female; forced expiratory volume; forced vital capacity; gas chromatography; human; hypertension; hypoxia; IC50; lung adenocarcinoma; lung cancer; major clinical study; male; mass fragmentography; mass spectrometry; middle aged; mouth hygiene; pilot study; polysomnography; preliminary data; principal component analysis; quality control; questionnaire; randomized controlled trial; screening test; single blind procedure; spirometry; squamous cell carcinoma; breast tumor; breath analysis; chronic obstructive lung disease; lung tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Breath Tests; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive; Single-Blind Method; Volatile Organic Compounds
Identity
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
PubMed ID
Additional Document Info
start page
end page
volume
issue