Removal of ronidazole and sulfamethoxazole from water solutions by adsorption on granular activated carbon: equilibrium and intraparticle diffusion mechanisms
Article
Overview
Research
Identity
Additional Document Info
View All
Overview
abstract
The equilibrium and intraparticle diffusion of ronidazole (RNZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) during the adsorption on granular activated carbon (GAC) from aqueous solution was investigated in this work. The solution pH, temperature, ionic strength and water matrix affected the adsorption capacity of GAC towards SMX, but no effect was observed for the adsorption of RNZ. This behavior was due to the different mechanism involved in the adsorption of both antibiotics. The adsorption capacity of GAC towards RNZ was greater than that towards SMX. Molecular computation allowed the estimation of the binding free energy and confirmed that the adsorption of RNZ was more favorable than the adsorption of SMX. The adsorption mechanism of both antibiotics is governed by π–π dispersive interactions, and molecular simulation demonstrated that the coulombic interactions did not affect, but the solvation and nonpolar interactions play a significant role on the adsorption of both antibiotics. The application of diffusional models revealed that the overall adsorption rate of both antibiotics is controlled by intraparticle diffusion. Moreover, the surface diffusion was more predominant than the pore volume diffusion. Besides, surface diffusion coefficient, Ds, for RNZ was not a function of the aqueous matrix, whereas Ds for SMX was highly dependent on the water matrix. © 2016, Springer Science Business Media New York.
The equilibrium and intraparticle diffusion of ronidazole (RNZ) and sulfamethoxazole (SMX) during the adsorption on granular activated carbon (GAC) from aqueous solution was investigated in this work. The solution pH, temperature, ionic strength and water matrix affected the adsorption capacity of GAC towards SMX, but no effect was observed for the adsorption of RNZ. This behavior was due to the different mechanism involved in the adsorption of both antibiotics. The adsorption capacity of GAC towards RNZ was greater than that towards SMX. Molecular computation allowed the estimation of the binding free energy and confirmed that the adsorption of RNZ was more favorable than the adsorption of SMX. The adsorption mechanism of both antibiotics is governed by π–π dispersive interactions, and molecular simulation demonstrated that the coulombic interactions did not affect, but the solvation and nonpolar interactions play a significant role on the adsorption of both antibiotics. The application of diffusional models revealed that the overall adsorption rate of both antibiotics is controlled by intraparticle diffusion. Moreover, the surface diffusion was more predominant than the pore volume diffusion. Besides, surface diffusion coefficient, Ds, for RNZ was not a function of the aqueous matrix, whereas Ds for SMX was highly dependent on the water matrix. © 2016, Springer Science%2bBusiness Media New York.
publication date
published in
Research
keywords
Adsorption mechanism; Antibiotics; Intraparticle diffusion mechanism; Surface diffusion Activated carbon; Antibiotics; Binding energy; Diffusion; Free energy; Granular materials; Ionic strength; Solutions; Surface diffusion; Adsorption mechanism; Coulombic interactions; Dispersive interactions; Granular activated carbons; Intra-particle diffusion; Molecular computations; Molecular simulations; Sulfamethoxazole (SMX); Adsorption
Identity
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)
Additional Document Info
start page
end page
volume
issue