Efficiency of Adsorption and Photodegradation of Composite TiO2/Fe2O3 and Industrial Wastes in Cyanide Removal Article uri icon

abstract

  • This research focused on the evaluation of the Fe2O3/TiO2 composite and two industrial wastes, a kaolin (Clay-K) and a blast furnace sludge (BFS), as adsorbents and/or photocatalytic materials to enhance the removal of cyanide from aqueous solutions. Cyanide adsorption tests were conducted in the absence of light. In contrast, cyanide photodegradation tests were conducted under three types of irradiations: visible light, ultraviolet (UV) light, and natural sunlight. For the latter case, two irradiance conditions were evaluated. Cyanide adsorption from aqueous phases was similar for Clay-K and TiO2/Fe2O3 materials, which adsorbed almost twice as much cyanide compared to the BFS sample. The differences observed in cyanide removal were explained in terms of the material’s surface area and chemical composition, and a complexation of cyanide ions with surface metals was suggested as the most feasible adsorption mechanism. The set of cyanide photodegradation experiments promoted, in general, higher cyanide removal from the aqueous solution compared to the adsorption processes. Under the conditions used in this study and when using Clay-K and BFS as promoters, cyanide photodegradation progressively enhanced with the following radiations: visible light < UV light ~ UV solar ≤ Visible solar. In the case of the TiO2/Fe2O3 composite, cyanide photodegradation increased in the following order: UV light < visible light < UV solar ~ Visible solar. Clearly, solar radiation had a significant effect on promoting cyanide removal. For experiments conducted with natural sunlight, the set with irradiance of 600–800 W/m2 exhibited the highest cyanide removal percentage, and the BFS had the best performance among the three tested samples over a period of 2 h. Results showed the benefit of using industrial wastes to remove cyanide from aqueous solutions and illustrates remediation of industrial effluents is potentially feasible within the framework of a circular economy. © 2022 by the authors.
  • This research focused on the evaluation of the Fe2O3/TiO2 composite and two industrial wastes, a kaolin (Clay-K) and a blast furnace sludge (BFS), as adsorbents and/or photocatalytic materials to enhance the removal of cyanide from aqueous solutions. Cyanide adsorption tests were conducted in the absence of light. In contrast, cyanide photodegradation tests were conducted under three types of irradiations: visible light, ultraviolet (UV) light, and natural sunlight. For the latter case, two irradiance conditions were evaluated. Cyanide adsorption from aqueous phases was similar for Clay-K and TiO2/Fe2O3 materials, which adsorbed almost twice as much cyanide compared to the BFS sample. The differences observed in cyanide removal were explained in terms of the material’s surface area and chemical composition, and a complexation of cyanide ions with surface metals was suggested as the most feasible adsorption mechanism. The set of cyanide photodegradation experiments promoted, in general, higher cyanide removal from the aqueous solution compared to the adsorption processes. Under the conditions used in this study and when using Clay-K and BFS as promoters, cyanide photodegradation progressively enhanced with the following radiations: visible light < UV light ~ UV%2bsolar ≤ Visible%2bsolar. In the case of the TiO2/Fe2O3 composite, cyanide photodegradation increased in the following order: UV light < visible light < UV%2bsolar ~ Visible%2bsolar. Clearly, solar radiation had a significant effect on promoting cyanide removal. For experiments conducted with natural sunlight, the set with irradiance of 600–800 W/m2 exhibited the highest cyanide removal percentage, and the BFS had the best performance among the three tested samples over a period of 2 h. Results showed the benefit of using industrial wastes to remove cyanide from aqueous solutions and illustrates remediation of industrial effluents is potentially feasible within the framework of a circular economy. © 2022 by the authors.

publication date

  • 2022-01-01